Відео

So cool!

👍👍👍👍👍❤❤❤❤❤

Thank you

A little too fast on the explanation

I love to come on board

I look forward for this scholarship

Best explanation. Could you please do a video on difference PVM and POVM?

Absolutely fantastic. Thank you.

I will continue watching to see how this turns out. At the beginning of the video, there was a diagram showing FPGA, GPU, Quantum accelerator peripherals. Following that there was a block diagram of a classical computer that was being adapted for Quantum Computing. That feels like too very different approaches.

What a great video <3

Is wave function a vector?

I agree with your interpretation of the cat experiment. The Copenhagen interpretation is an unconvincing interpretation that was created as a result of being hesitant about Einstein's idea of wave packets. We should follow Born's probability interpretation.

how does it come out that the probability amplitude of the + state with coefficient 1/2 + e^(i*fi)/2 will be 1/2+cos(fi)/2? Or did you mean that the probability of 0 measurement output will be this much? But then it is a mistake to say that we measure in the X base.

What is happening with the slide at 4:38 V=phi and the & sign on top of each other, clearly some kind of error

Amazing, I am speechless how intuitive you made it. Thanks

I'm pretty excited about some new things I learned from this video as I am currently working on cryogenic memory for new architectures with control components. Many thanks. I am aware the Qblox is at the APS March meeting here in Minneapolis, but I wasn't able to make it this year 😅.

Did not explain anyons

Thanks for your video

“U” Shape Waves This model may be related to the your topic. ua-cam.com/video/wrBsqiE0vG4/v-deo.htmlsi=waT8lY2iX-wJdjO3 Thanks for your informative and well produced video. You and your viewers might find the quantum-like analog interesting and useful. I have been trying to describe the “U” shape wave that is produced in my amateur science mechanical model in the video link. I hear if you over-lap all the waves together using Fournier Transforms, it may make a “U” shape or square wave. Can this be correct representation Feynman Path Integrals? In the model, “U” shape waves are produced as the loading increases and just before the wave-like function shifts to the next higher energy level. Your viewers might be interested in seeing the load verse deflection graph in white paper found elsewhere on my UA-cam channel. Actually replicating it with a sheet of clear folder plastic and tape. Seeing it first hand is worth the effort.

This is the simplest explanation I've seen of something useful that you can do with a quantum computer...

1:15 there must be a mistake regarding charging energies. A 100 times larger radius should result in an energy 100 times smaller (here its 10 times smaller: 30mev/3mev = 10).

around 1:40 you are referring to a row vector as a column vector and verse visa.

3:34. Believe I would just settle on syncing clocks.

If an odd number wasn’t there from factoring and all then trees couldn’t be explained, rught

Way to quantum

Excelente recomendación tienes con el ING Jose Alfonso Hernando. El Maestro de maestros Valdeande Magico ... Saludos

Animo Pablo, los BEazcus bajando al mundo cuántico😂

Thank you for explaining this concept so clearly and easily! Very helpful <3

For M_i where does the factor 1/2 come from? The eigenvector is just (1, i) right?

Lol what kind of definition is that: coherence is the absence of decoherence. I think a discussion of phase would be helpful here.

I would mark this video more as marketing rather than explanatory. Machinery probably very interesting.

Said a whole lot of nothing

What’s the catch of Germanium?

very nice video! looks like a typo at 3:07 mark, c and c^\dagger equations are reversed, provided they are consistent to the gamma equations

This is really amazing! Why don't more people know about it.

video which suits me the best for understanding Deutsch Jozsa!

they have done a shit-ton of work simplifying the math somewhat since i graduated astrophysics in '93... i would have done better in linear algebra and statistical mechanics if we had these processes to learn with...

But Psi is just a smooth function solution of the Schrodinger PDE. How does Psi(t,x,y,z) relate to this bra-ket notation?

Good

So nice

This may be the lamest possible use for quantum computers. Don’t they have any recipes for mayonaise?

This is the best explanation I've found. Thank you so much!!!

very very very useful, I finally get how we measure quantum states. Thank you, handsome pal

At 1:55 did you mean going from Digital to Analogue domains (consistent with eh ADC in the circuit), as opposed to what was said? Very informative video - thank you. 🙂

I wonder if it can be used for : 1. universe simulation 2. breaking password & 3. playing chess vs super computer 4. doing my homework 5. mining bitcoin 😅

A very insightful explanation and visualization. I was struggling to understand the axis of rotation for each of the gates, but this video made everything crystal clear. Thank you so much!

bisa kah anda menunjukkan alat nyatanya

Without any objective background material the series feels like propaganda. By the way, I would have started this series with the double-slit experiment.

@ 2:58 As a side note, this is one of the biggest problems in producing a practical quantum computer. And we (= mankind) are still far from solving this problem. The theory is nice, but reality often isn't that nice ;-)

But at the moment the execution of this algorithm takes so much time that during processing the state decoheres and the results are useless.